Are at the core of ecological systems
Trophic cascade : Sea otters indirectly enhance kelp abundance by consuming herbivorous sea urchins
Estes et al. [2011]
Climate change
What are the effects of temperature ?
On populations
On their interactions
On the dynamics of food webs
Most studies explore :
with different
Hard to disentangle the various effects of temperature
How do they propagate from the populations to the community?
Effects of warming : compare changes in the dynamics at the community and species levels
Albouy et al [2019], Irigoien et al [2014]
Modelling communities to infer their structural and dynamical properties
Lotka-Volterra system
dBidt=production−predation losses−internal lossesdBidt=giBi+∑jϵAijBiBj−∑kAkiBiBk−DiB2i
bi=mβib0e−E/kT
Growth and attack rate Savage et al [2004], Li et al [2018]
Modelling communities to infer their structural and dynamical properties
Lotka-Volterra system
dBidt=gi+∑jϵAijBj−∑kAkiBk−DiBi
An important but not well known parameter
Intraspecific density dependent regulation
A population’s growth rate is negatively affected by its own population
density
Important to match stability levels observed in nature
Self-regulation is completely unknown...
Biomass can be inferred from allometric relationship
dBidt=giBi+∑jϵAijBiBj−∑kAkiBiBk−DiB2i
Simulate the dynamics of communities and measure some dynamical properties
Trophic control (bottom-up vs top-down)
λ=ϵA221D1D2
Sum species biomass
Relative change in species biomass
Variability : temporal biomass variance in response to stochastic pertubations (community average)
V=tr(C) C covariance matrix, solution of the Lyapunov equation JC+CJT=I with J Jacobian matrix
Arnoldi et al [2019]
Collectivity : importance of indirect interactions (collectivity = 1, a change in species abundance affect other species far in the network)
ϕ=ρ(Mij)=max
spectral radius of M_{ij} = A_{ij}/D_i, \lambda_i(M) is the ith eigenvalue of matrix M
Arnoldi et al [in prep]
\begin{align} \Delta(x) = \textrm{log}_{10}(x_{warm}) - \textrm{log}_{10}(x) \approx (x_{warm} - x)/x \end{align}
Warming affects individual species more significantly than communities as an entity
Focus on direct effect of temperature on biological rates and interactions
Apply the framework to identify latitudinal variation in trophic control, variability and collectivity
Other variables drive variation in community dynamics
Indirect effects of warming
Stronger impact of warming at the species level than at the community level
Special thanks to
Are at the core of ecological systems
Trophic cascade : Sea otters indirectly enhance kelp abundance by consuming herbivorous sea urchins
Estes et al. [2011]
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
Esc | Back to slideshow |
Are at the core of ecological systems
Trophic cascade : Sea otters indirectly enhance kelp abundance by consuming herbivorous sea urchins
Estes et al. [2011]
Climate change
What are the effects of temperature ?
On populations
On their interactions
On the dynamics of food webs
Most studies explore :
with different
Hard to disentangle the various effects of temperature
How do they propagate from the populations to the community?
Effects of warming : compare changes in the dynamics at the community and species levels
Albouy et al [2019], Irigoien et al [2014]
Modelling communities to infer their structural and dynamical properties
Lotka-Volterra system
\begin{align} \dfrac{dB_i}{dt} &= \textrm{production} - \textrm{predation losses} - \textrm{internal losses} \\ \frac{dB_i}{dt} &= g_iB_i + \sum_j \epsilon A_{ij} B_iB_j-\sum_k A_{ki} B_iB_k - D_iB_i^2 \end{align}
\large b_i = m_i^\beta b_0e^{-E/kT}
Growth and attack rate Savage et al [2004], Li et al [2018]
Modelling communities to infer their structural and dynamical properties
Lotka-Volterra system
\begin{align} \frac{dB_i}{dt} = g_i + \sum_j \epsilon A_{ij} B_j-\sum_k A_{ki} B_k - D_iB_i \end{align}
An important but not well known parameter
Intraspecific density dependent regulation
A population’s growth rate is negatively affected by its own population
density
Important to match stability levels observed in nature
Self-regulation is completely unknown...
Biomass can be inferred from allometric relationship
\begin{align}
\frac{dB_i}{dt} = g_iB_i + \sum_j \epsilon A_{ij} B_iB_j-\sum_k A_{ki} B_iB_k - D_iB_i^2
\end{align}
Simulate the dynamics of communities and measure some dynamical properties
Trophic control (bottom-up vs top-down)
\begin{align} \lambda = \frac{\epsilon A_{21}^2}{D_1D_2} \end{align}
Sum species biomass
Relative change in species biomass
Variability : temporal biomass variance in response to stochastic pertubations (community average)
\begin{align} \mathcal{V} = tr(C) \end{align} C covariance matrix, solution of the Lyapunov equation JC+CJ^T = \mathbb I with J Jacobian matrix
Arnoldi et al [2019]
Collectivity : importance of indirect interactions (collectivity = 1, a change in species abundance affect other species far in the network)
\begin{align} \phi = \rho(M_{ij}) = \max_i|\lambda_i(M)| \end{align}
spectral radius of M_{ij} = A_{ij}/D_i, \lambda_i(M) is the ith eigenvalue of matrix M
Arnoldi et al [in prep]
\begin{align} \Delta(x) = \textrm{log}_{10}(x_{warm}) - \textrm{log}_{10}(x) \approx (x_{warm} - x)/x \end{align}
Warming affects individual species more significantly than communities as an entity
Focus on direct effect of temperature on biological rates and interactions
Apply the framework to identify latitudinal variation in trophic control, variability and collectivity
Other variables drive variation in community dynamics
Indirect effects of warming
Stronger impact of warming at the species level than at the community level
Special thanks to